L’espace est devenu une gigantesque poubelle.
En 2013, 6.500 tonnes de “débris de l’espace”, satellites abandonnés ou morceaux de fusée pour l’essentiel, gravitaient autour de la Terre. Des détritus qui peuvent être fatals à ceux qui les croisent, et que l’Agence spatiale européenne (ESA) entend aujourd’hui nettoyer. Mode opératoire? Un filet géant, ou un laser d’énergie suffisamment puissant pour désintégrer les satellites défunts. Seul problème, le coût de cette opération, et les questions de droit international et de propriété des débris. Mais le temps presse. Ces détritus se sont accumulés depuis 1961 et le début de la conquête spatiale, et forment comme un anneau de fragments en orbite. Or la moindre collision avec une navette ou une fusée serait fatale pour elles.
“Un objet de 10 centimètres serait capable de briser totalement un vaisseau spatial au moment de l’impact”, indique Heiner Klinkrad, de l’ESA. “Rien qu’une collision avec un objet d’un centimètre à la vitesse classique de 50.000 kilomètres/heure dégagerait une énergie équivalente à une grenade qui explose.” Ces dernières années, 250 explosions ont été recensées, dégageant encore plus de débris. Le risque de réaction en chaîne est donc élevé. “On parle de syndrome Kessler“, précise Heiner Klinkrad. “C’est-à-dire des collisions de débris en cascade qui rendraient certaines régions orbitales inutilisables à long terme.”
O espaço tornou-se um campo de lixo gigante.
Em 2013, 6.500 toneladas de “lixo espacial”, satélites abandonados ou pedaços de foguete essencialmente, giravam em torno da Terra. Lixo que pode ser fatal para aqueles que o atravessam, e que a Agência Espacial Europeia (ESA) l’Agence spatiale européenne (ESA) quer limpar hoje. Procedimento? Uma rede gigante ou um poderoso laser com energia suficiente para desintegrar os satélites defuntos. O único problema fica o custo da operação e as questões de direito internacional e de propriedade dos detritos. Mas o tempo é curto. Estes lixo foi acumulado desde 1961 e o início da conquista do espaço e tem agora forma de anel de fragmentos em órbita. Qualquer colisão com uma naveta ou um foguete seria fatal para eles.
“Um objeto de 10 centímetros seria capaz de quebrar totalmente uma nave espacial no momento do impacto”, disse Heiner Klinkrad, ESA. “Uma colisão com um objecto de apenas um centímetro à velocidade clássico de 50,000 km / h equivale a energia duma granada explodindo.” Nos últimos anos, foram registados 250 explosões, libertando ainda mais detritos. O risco de reacção em cadeia é alta. “Fala-se de síndrome de Kessler”, diz Heiner Klinkrad. “Ou seja, colisões em cascata de detritos que tornariam algumas regiões orbitais inutilizáveis a longo prazo.”
Space has become a giant trash.
In 2013, 6,500 tons of “space debris”, abandoned satellites or pieces of rocket essentially, are revolving around the Earth. That garbage can be fatal to those who cross it, and it’s why European Space Agency (ESA) l’Agence spatiale européenne (ESA) want to clean it today. Procedure? A giant net, or a powerful laser with enough energy to break down dead satellites. The mainly problem is the cost of the operation, the international laws issues and debris’s property. But time is short. These accumulated trash, since 1961 and the beginning of the space’s conquest, forms now as a ring of fragments in orbit. Any collision with a shuttle or rocket would be fatal for them. “An object of 10 centimeters would be able to totally break a spaceship at the time of impact,” said Heiner Klinkrad, ESA. “Just a collision with a one centimeter object to the classic speed of 50,000 km / h equivalent to absolve a grenade exploding energy.”
In recent years, 250 explosions were recorded, releasing yet more debris. The risk of chain reaction is high. “There is talk of Kessler syndrome,” says Heiner Klinkrad. “That is to say, collisions with debris cascading render unusable some orbital regions in the long term.”
Higher radioactivity near the ocean
However, the liquid tested this time was extracted from a new sampling point, closer to the ocean than where the water had been collected for the previous review. Tepco had indicated that water had accumulated and had not approached the ocean. Tighter controls shows that this is probably not the case.
Tepco is not as affirmative
Tepco said not being able to explain why the radioactivity of groundwater near the Pacific is higher, but stressed that “the seawater analyzed, it does not show increased levels of radioactivity “. However, the company, which promises to strength controls, says “can not currently determine whether radioactive water is flowing or not in the nearby ocean.”
afp / ptur 30.06.2013 12:22
+ trailer « Welcome to Fukushima » d’Alain de Halleux (2013)
http://wp.me/p3x4D4-8J